Law For Food: The law affects what you eat. What you buy to eat affects the law.

A Hands-Off Hypothesis
30 April 2007, 5:36 pm
Filed under: food politics, Regulation

Earlier today, I wrote:

A level playing field cannot be had, however, if regulators are not to some degree immune to political pressure (in, I suggest, a similar way as U.S. Attorneys should be immune to political pressure), and political pressure is almost always tied to business interests.

And then I thought, you know, there do seem to have been a lot of food-borne illness outbreaks lately.


A CDC Press Release dated April 12, 2007, begins with the following paragraph:

A report released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows a leveling of cases for some foodborne infections after a period of decline. For others, incidences of infection which had declined appear to be returning to earlier levels.

(Emphasis added.)

The summary of that report dates the leveling off and return to earlier levels from 2000 forward.

In and of itself, this doesn’t prove anything, but it suggests a line of inquiry that might prove fruitful. Stay tuned.


1 Comment so far
Leave a comment

[…] The experts rated the FDA generally between 2 and five. This is consistent with a CDC report from earlier this year which noted that food-borne illness levels had leveled off in 2000 and were on the rise. I […]

Pingback by Intimidation of FDA Employees « Law For Food

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: